Saturday, January 19th, 2019

Admins to ignore AAUP sanction

Krysteana Scribner

Posted on November 24, 2014 in News
By Emma James

The American Association for University Professors (AAUP), an organization dedicated to advancing academic freedom and shared governance, defined fundamental professional values and standards for higher education and ensuring higher education’s contribution to the common good, sent President David Flanagan a letter in opposition to recent cuts.

This is the second time this year the AAUP has intervened with administrative decisions, the first time was last spring when President Theodora Kalikow proposed the elimination of four academic programs, which would result in the elimination of tenured and long term non-tenured faculty.

According to the letter, USM has not acted in accordance to the statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure, developed by the AAUP jointly with the Association of American Colleges and Universities and endorsed by more than 220 scholarly and higher-education organizations.

Chris Quint, executive director of public affairs, explained that all actions the university has taken in the elimination process have been based on contractual obligations, despite accusations the letter presents.

“From the purposes of who we follow, or what we follow when it comes to these layoffs or the program eliminations, we adhere to the contract, we adhere to the University of Maine system and the University of Southern Maine governing documents,” said Quint. “While we appreciate their letter, at this point we have no plans to be responding to them. They do not have any standing in this matter.”

According to Anita Levy, senior program officer of the AAUP, the organization has not yet determined next steps, as they are giving administration a chance to respond. If a response is indeed declined, there is a possibility that an ad-hoc investigation will be authorized. If this does happen, an investigation may lead to a placement on AAUP’s sanctions lists, which would seriously damage USM’s reputation even further. USM may also be placed on a “no-hire” list, which would make it difficult to hire faculty in the future.

Quint, however, argued that no new information will be found, referring to the elimination process as an “open book.”

“They’re free to take whatever action they have. They don’t have any legal standing when it comes to this matter. We adhere to the contract and we adhere to governance documents,” said Quint. “We’re a public institution. Anything that we do as a university is public information. We have nothing to hide.”

Though a reputable organization, Quint explained that they have no say in how the university is run.

“There’s a lot of things said and a lot of things thrown out there. Some of them have validity others have none,” said Quint. “The deficit is real; we’re not taking these actions because of some corporate takeover, or some ideological agenda that we have. We’re taking these actions to right size the university.”

USM is just one university that is part of what seems to be a national trend, according to Levy. Levy explained that there are a number of institutions where administrations make unilateral determinations to reorganize program in a certain way, regardless if that reorganization has educational value.

“Administrators are making these kinds of cuts and eliminating programs without adequately consulting the faculty and determining whether or not those kinds of cuts would be beneficial as a whole for student learns,” Levy said.

Quint indicated that USM will continue to operate in a direction toward financial sustainability, rather than change how things are being done to align with the AAUP’s standards.

“We’re going to continue to operate in the best interest of our students here, and do what’s necessary to make this an affordable and accessible university for our current and future students,” Quint said.

In the meantime, Levy urges students to remain involved and active on campus.

“I think students have to continue to be activists and to advocate for themselves and the faculty, and take an active role in trying to bring the administration into the daylight. They seem to want to operate behind closed doors,” said Levy. “That’s not the way to run a university.”

6 Responses to “Admins to ignore AAUP sanction”

Leave a Reply

Please fill the required box or you can’t comment at all. Please use kind words. Your e-mail address will not be published.

Gravatar is supported.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>